WeeklySport

Wednesday, 2 May 2012

MAN CITY WILL WIN THE LEAGUE NOW


I BELIEVE that Manchester City will now go on to win the Premier League after their convincing win over neighbours United in the week.



Many pundits reckon they will fall at Newcastle on Sunday, but I think they will win 3-1 to go a step closer to winning their first top-flight title since 1968.



The Blues are in fine form and Roberto Mancini is proving a top, top manager – as he showed by nearly taking a punch from Fergie on Monday night!



And then there is the little matter of history repeating itself. Funnily enough, on Saturday May 11 in 1968, City won 4-3 at Newcastle United to take the 1st Division Title - the last time they won it. Goals from Mike Summerbee, Neil Young (2) and Franny Lee secured the crown.

This time the match at St James’ is the penultimate game of their season - but the result is as crucial now as United continue to breathe down their necks. I think they will draw on the spirit of their ’68 triumph at St James’ and then win the title at home the following week against QPR.



FRANK WORRALL


ROY HODGSON – A RECESSION ENGLAND MANAGER FOR THESE RECESSION TIMES


IN THESE very pages I told you a few weeks ago that Roy Hodgson would become England manager – after my spies at FA HQ told me that he was their No 1 choice above Harry Redknapp and Martin O’Neill.
The FA didn’t dispute Harry’s achievements at Tottenham nor his ability to man manage. But there was a feeling that Hodgson was much the better international ambassador and that by choosing Roy there would be no unseemly squabbles over paying up multi-million pound contracts (estimated at up to £10 million for Harry, nothing for Roy - he had yet to sign his new deal at West Brom).
Plus there is the FA’s claim that Roy is much better suited to the job than Harry or O’Neill – because he is well versed in both international and continental football after his time as manager of Finland, Swizterland and Inter Milan.
But none of that takes away the feeling that as football fans we have been short-changed. That we have got Hodgson primarily because he came on the cheap and that he won’t rock the boat – we have got a manager to reflect the times we live in right now. An austere, recession manager - for an austere, recession period.
I felt pretty flat when he was unveiled this week. At least with Harry we would have had someone to lift the gloom of the recession – a man we could laugh with and at as he attempted to get England playing with passion and verve. With Roy, it is like being told you must stay and watch the TV and eat soup and bread – no fun nights out on the town for us for four years!

We have an England manager who comes with low expectations and who can probably be relied to live up to them. Use this as a key yardstick of how it is going to be under Hodgson – if he picks Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain in his final 23 for the Euros it will be a very good sign. If, as I expect, he doesn’t, then you know what to expect – we will exit either at the opening group stage, or the first knockout stage as he goes with his outdated belief that 4-4-2 is still the way forward rather than the fluid, flexibility of say the interchangeable system employed by Spain, France or Holland.

They say that the definition of insanity is repeating the same mistake time and again – and expecting a different outcome. Well, Roy, you saw how hard it was for you to make a go of it at Liverpool when you weren’t the man the fans wanted – why should it be any different at England, when this time again aren’t the man the nation’s fans wanted?

And why have the FA given Roy a four-year deal? If it all goes pear-shaped quickly, they could end up having to pay him two years money - £6million smackers! Why, when the FA quad who chose him are three-quarters made up of a flash PR bloke and two chartered accountants (and Trev Brooking who looked very uncomfortable indeed when he tried to justify why Roy was sat next to him rather than Harry) did they not have the financial and legal sense to give him a two-year deal, thus limiting any possible (likely) payout for dismissal?

Then again, the fact that three of the four men who chose the new England boss are a flash PR bloke and and two chartered accountants – rather than proper, knowledgeable  footballing men – perhaps helps explain why Roy Hodgson is now the new England manager.

FRANK WORRALL
www.frankworrall.com


Wednesday, 25 April 2012

Di Matteo the genius - but a problem...Roman has already lined up a new boss

FOOTBALL



THE GREATEST PERFORMANCE EVER

BY AN ENGLISH TEAM IN

THE CHAMPIONS LEAGUE



I THOUGHT that I’d seen it all when Man United beat Bayern Munich with those two wonderful late, late goals in the Champions League final in Barcelona in 1999. Then Liverpool came back from 3-0 down at half-time in the 2005 final to beat AC Milan on penalties after it ended 3-3.



But on Tuesday night even those two magnificent efforts by English clubs were eclipsed by Chelsea. Their 2-2 draw on the night (which led to a 3-2 aggregate win) was simply the best performance EVER by an English club in the Champions League – given the brilliance of the best footballing team in the world they were up against, the massive odds stacked against them (made even greater when Terry foolishly got himself dismissed) and the fact that they had already lost one of their centre-backs (Gary Cahill) to injury early on.



And the match itself was one arguably THE BEST EVER Champions League game. It had everything – a sending-off, a penalty miss (who would have thought that the world’s best player Lionel Messi would fluff that chance?), a goal of genius (from Ramires), a goal (!) from Torres and a raft of tantalising sub-scripts (including the clear antagonism between Lampard and Fabregas) to back up the main draft of the David v Goliath battle.



I didn’t give the Blues much hope when they were down to 10-men and 2-0 down on the night. Who, in their right minds, would? They also had to overcome the Nou Camp crowd – yet they did it. Of course, the wonderful chipped goal from Ramires was the turning point, but the defensive campaign Chelsea mounted was simply magnificent.



It was also good to see Barcelona brought down to size. In recent years they have crushed opponents like a bully and been universally praised for their football. OK, they do have superb technique and are a joy to watch – but they also do a nice number in the dark arts, which people tend to overlook, I thought there was a certain irony in them having a go at Drogba after the first leg for diving when the great Messi himself is not averse to such tactics. Also, wasn’t it great to see Sergio Busquets brought down a peg or two – I despise this player more than any other in top-level world football. He is a cheat and a whinger – a man who will fall over at the slightest touch – yet is the first to complain that he is being hard done by when he (often) takes a slice of someone else’s legs. I was sick when he scored but felt divine justice was done when he haplessly chased back after Torres and fell down on his back dejected when the big striker put the ball in the back of the net. Busquets, public enemy No 1 in the Champions League, had certainly got his just desserts for once.



There were plenty of other talking points in the game, Yes, Terry deserved to be sent off – one day I hope he reveals just what Sanchez did to rile him. Terry is usually the most disciplined of men, so we must assume it was something verbal or a running battle.



Now Terry misses the final – along with Ramires, Meireles and Ivanovic. He is a big loss in terms of leadership, but the central defensive area seemed more fluid and speedier with him out, so that may not be the end of the world. Certainly, if David Luiz and Gary Cahill can recover in time that would be a fair pairing – although I would be very reluctant to use both from the start as they have both suffered hamstring injuries, which are notorious for flaring back up as soon as players return to action. The last thing Chelsea need is two subs on for those two within the first few minutes; subs could be the key to victory in Munich, you just don’t want to use two of the three you are allowed so early on.



Similarly, Ivanovic is a loss, like Terry, in terms of his physical strength but Boswinga could slot into the right-back role if Cahill and Luiz do make it.



Also, you have a like for like swop with Michael Essien stepping in for Raul Meireles. The Portuguese is probably the least critical of the ban losses – he did tend to give away the ball too cheaply in Barcelona. And it is surely time that Essien stepped up to the plate once again and showed us the talents that made him one of the best, aggressive midfielders in the world not that long ago.



The biggest loss is the Brazilian Ramires. He was the man of the match in Barcelona. Apart from his superb goal, he has the best engine of anyone in the English game since Roy Keane. A different type of player to Keane, he nevertheless does the work of two men, as Roy did, and works brilliantly between all three areas of the pitch – defence, midfield and attack.



He will be sorely missed. I would replace him with Daniel Sturridge, but make it clear to the youngster that he MUST do his share of defensive tracking back.



Also on the subject of those banned for the final, I had been surprised by how chirpy Ivanovic had been after the win. Sure, the team had reached Munich but he would not be there because of his booking. Then it became clear just why the Serbian was so upbeat – he hadn’t been aware his booking would cost him his place in the final. He was made aware of the fact by Sky’s post-match interviewere Geoff Meades – Branislav bravely tried to hide his gut disappointment when Meades revealed the bad news but his face was crumbling. I felt so sorry for the big defender – what a terrible way to learn such news, in front of millions of viewers as your team-mates celebrated good fortune.



On the same point, shouldn’t Chelsea’s managerial team have made him – and presumably the others on a yellow card – aware that an indiscretion could cost them so dearly? I’m not saying that they should have been told to play half-heartedly, but certainly it would have meant they knew that any silly booking – such as backchat to the ref or timewasting – should be avoided at all costs.



Which brings us to the manager himself. Yes, step forward Roberto Di Matteo and bask in your well-earned moment in the limelight. The Italian has done everything asked of him as an interim manager – and more. This man is no Avram Grant, he is tactically astute and a fine man-manager – as he proved by moving Ramires to right-back and pinning Ivanovic and Boswinga at the heart of the defence after Terry’s sending-off.



He deserves to be made up to full-time boss. My sources at the Bridge tell me there is a particular reason why he has not been – Roman has already made contact and set up a deal with the man he wants to take over in the summer. If that man is either Mourinho or Guardiola (and I am led to believe it could be Jose) then that is fair enough – you can’t argue with the appointment of one of the top three managers in the world (the other being Ferguson).



But if it is someone of the ilk of Laurent Blanc or Didier Deschamps, then Roman should have a quiet word with them, tell them the deal is off and give them a few quid on the condition that they keep their mouths shut.



It is the least the owner owes to the man who has saved Chelsea’s season.





FRANK WORRALL





FRANKIE’S FLUTTER



ONE football match looms large above all others this next week – Man City v Man Utd in a clash at the Etihad that will have a real outcome on the title race. If City win they are in the driving seat to take the title – but if they lose or draw United are almost home.



I am going for a City win, by 2-1, with Balotelli coming on to score the winner!



(For more information on Frank and his bestselling sports books, see www.frankworrall.com)

Weekly Sport readers can buy Frank’s insightful book on Sir Alex Ferguson for the special price of only £2.74 on Kindle (retail price £17.99 for the hardback)…go to http://www.amazon.co.uk/Walking-Fergie-Wonderland-Biography-ebook/dp/B00603XJB8/ref=sr_1_7?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1326291046&sr=1-7




Wednesday, 18 April 2012

FRANKIE'S FLUTTERS


GOT one right last week – as Liverpool beat Everton 2-1 in the FA Cup semi final at Wembley, just as I predicted.

Looking at next week’s return semis in the Champions League, I’m going to shy away from predicting the Chelsea result in Barca, as I don’t want to put the curse on John Terry and Co!
But I do believe that Bayern Munich will now complete the job they started last week when they beat Real Madrid 2-1 in Munich. I can see Bayern scoring at least once as Real go all out for the goals that will take them to the Final. Madrid’s problem is a very un-Jose Mourinho-like problem…their defence stinks.
Yes, OK, they are brilliant as an attacking force – with the likes of Ronaldo and Higuain and Benzema – but defensively are extremely suspect. Ramos is no central defender; his positioning was all over the place in Munich and the rest of the backline is similarly unreliable…with a yellow or red card simply waiting to happen when they come up against a top attacking force – which Bayern certainly are with the wondrous, if hard-to-like, Robben and Ribery. So it’s Bayern for me in a 2-2 draw on the night and through on away goals.